When Donor Dollars Depend on Due Process: A Call to Action for UGM (Vancouver)

October 20, 2025 CorruptionBC BLOG, corruption, Housing & Homeless, Provincial Corruption, Union Gospel Mission, Vancouver Public Library 0

On November 14, I attempted to volunteer for a half-day clothing-sorting shift at Union Gospel Mission (UGM) in Vancouver. I was refused by Tim Gabuna, Supervisor, Volunteer Resources, who—like Bethany Cheung—has never met me. The refusal relied on an alleged “past incident” that in fact was a minor disagreement with a staff member about seven years ago. There was no impartial investigation, no disclosure of particulars, and no opportunity for me to be heard.

This is not just about one person. UGM is donor-funded, and donors expect their contributions to translate into compassionate service and fair, unbiased processes. Excluding willing volunteers on the basis of untested, one-sided accounts frustrates donor intent and reduces service capacity when the community needs help most. UGM’s own public leadership and board list underscores where accountability ultimately sits. Union Gospel Mission

What Happened

  • Service intended: a single half-day to sort clothes for neighbors in need.

  • UGM’s refusal: an email citing “behaviours unacceptable for our volunteer code,” with no particulars and no hearing.

  • Context: the “behaviour” appears to reference a petty argument from ~7 years ago.

  • Material facts: Neither Mr. Gabuna nor Ms. Cheung has ever met me; my account has never been taken.

Why This Matters (Beyond Me)

  • Capacity: Turning away a half-day clothing-sorting volunteer reduces frontline capacity. People in need pay the price when policy is replaced by assumptions.

  • Stewardship: Donors fund UGM’s impact. Decisions that deter or exclude volunteers are stewardship decisions that donors reasonably expect to be impartial, documented, and reviewable.

  • Mission integrity: A Christian charity bears an even higher duty to hear people before judging them.

My Concerns (Carefully Stated)

  1. No impartial process / no right to be heard. Adverse decisions repeated by people who never met me, based on one-sided accounts.

  2. Reasonable apprehension of bias. I am a Middle Eastern volunteer with many years of service elsewhere. Sustaining a ban without meeting me or testing evidence raises a reasonable concern about bias.

  3. Possible undeclared conflict. Public pages list Tim Gabuna as a sermon speaker at Artisan Church in 2024–2025. In my opinion, prior public criticism I made of that church may have influenced perceptions. This underlines the need for a neutral reviewer not connected to prior decisions. artisanchurch.ca+1

What I’m Asking UGM To Do

  1. Commission an impartial review by a neutral decision-maker with no prior involvement.

  2. Disclose the record: dates, allegations, witnesses, and the applicable volunteer conduct/complaint policies at the time.

  3. Issue a reasoned determination addressing procedural fairness, bias concerns, and corrective steps (including apology and record correction, if warranted).

  4. Adopt safeguards so future volunteer disputes are assessed by trained, neutral reviewers on defined timelines.

  5. Report back to donors and the public with a brief, anonymized summary of process improvements, to uphold stewardship and trust.

About the Individuals Named Here

  • Tim Gabuna — Supervisor, Volunteer Resources at UGM (per his email). Public pages show him as a sermon speaker at Artisan Church (e.g., March 23 and May 11, 2025). artisanchurch.ca

  • Bethany Cheung — UGM staff who, to my knowledge, has not met me but has referenced historical allegations.

  • Note: Allegations about conduct in this post are my account and opinions based on direct experience and written communications. I invite UGM to provide information that corrects the record, and I will update this post fairly.

Contact UGM Leadership & Board (for respectful requests for a neutral review)

Executive Team

  • Dean Kurpjuweit, President.

  • Ryan Koch, Vice President, External Engagement.

  • Angel Tse, Vice President, Finance & Operations.

  • Stacey Reyes, Vice President, People Excellence.

  • Tara MacDonald, Vice President, Women and Families Programs.

  • Rob Thompson, Vice President, Men’s Programs.

  • Kris Knutson, Vice President, Outreach & Community Services.

  • Menna Tegene, Chief of Staff. Union Gospel Mission

Board of Directors

  • Gigi Chen-Kuo, Chairperson

  • Jim Barkman, Vice Chairperson

  • Kathy Chan, Treasurer

  • Dr. Joseph Yang, Secretary

  • Dr. Toma Timothy, Director

  • Jackee Kasandy, Director

  • Sara Robertson, Director

  • Dr. Trevor Wilson, Director

  • Danny Chase, Director

  • Anna King, Director

  • Robert Pasman, Director

  • Elaine Freeman, Director Union Gospel Mission

The Governance Problem

On November 14, I attempted to volunteer for a half-day clothing-sort at UGM. Tim Gabuna (Supervisor, Volunteer Resources) declined, citing a past issue from roughly seven years ago. Neither Mr. Gabuna nor Bethany Cheung has ever met me, and I was never granted an impartial investigation or even five minutes to be heard.

When a donor-funded charity bars a volunteer on the basis of one-sided, untested accounts, that is a governance failure. It weakens public trust and misaligns with donor expectations. (UGM leadership and board list is public; Mr. Gabuna is publicly listed as a sermon speaker at Artisan Church.) Union Gospel Mission+1

Reasonable Apprehension of Bias

I am a Middle Eastern volunteer with years of service at various organizations. Maintaining an adverse decision without meeting me or testing evidence raises a reasonable concern about bias. In my opinion, my prior public criticism of Artisan Church may contribute to prejudgment; that is precisely why independent review is required. (Artisan Church shows Mr. Gabuna as a sermon speaker in 2024–2025.) artisanchurch.ca

Donor Accountability & Public Trust

Donors fund UGM’s mission expecting:

  • Impartial, documented decisions affecting service capacity,

  • Board-level oversight when operational choices diminish front-line impact, and

  • Transparent correction when process fails.

Refusing a one-time, half-day volunteer shift to sort clothing, based on a seven-year-old dispute that was never neutrally reviewed, undercuts donor intent and harms community outcomes.

Requested Actions (Time-Bound)

  1. Independent reviewer (uninvolved previously) to reassess the matter.

  2. Full disclosure of records relied upon and policies in force.

  3. Written determination addressing procedural fairness, bias concerns, and remedies (including apology and record correction if warranted).

  4. Policy safeguards mandating neutral reviewers, bias training, and deadlines.

  5. Public stewardship note to donors summarizing improvements.

Contact UGM Leadership & Board (public list)

Respectfully urge an impartial review and safeguards. Executive Team: Dean Kurpjuweit, Ryan Koch, Angel Tse, Stacey Reyes, Tara MacDonald, Rob Thompson, Kris Knutson, Menna Tegene. Board: Gigi Chen-Kuo, Jim Barkman, Kathy Chan, Dr. Joseph Yang, Dr. Toma Timothy, Jackee Kasandy, Sara Robertson, Dr. Trevor Wilson, Danny Chase, Anna King, Robert Pasman, Elaine Freeman. Names per UGM’s leadership page, accessed Oct 20, 2025. Union Gospel Mission

About the Individuals Named Here

  • Tim Gabuna — Supervisor, Volunteer Resources (per his email). Also a public sermon speaker at Artisan Church. artisanchurch.ca

  • Bethany Cheung — UGM staff member who has not met me, to my knowledge, but has referenced historical allegations.

This article reflects my experience and opinions, supported by documents in my possession. UGM is invited to respond; I will publish any verifiable corrections or rebuttals in full.

Facebook Comments Box
About CorruptionBC 64 Articles
The concept of citizen journalism (also known as “public“, “participatory“, “democratic“ or “street” journalism is based upon public citizens “playing an active role in the process of collecting, reporting, analyzing, and disseminating news and information.” Similarly, Courtney C. Radsch defines citizen journalism “as an alternative and activist form of newsgathering and reporting that functions outside mainstream media institutions, often as a response to shortcomings in the professional journalistic field, that uses similar journalistic practices but is driven by different objectives and ideals and relies on alternative sources of legitimacy than traditional or mainstream journalism”. Jay Rosen proposes a simpler definition: “When the people formerly known as the audience employ the press tools they have in their possession to inform one another.”